|Comment Page||Associated Page||Comment Title||Comment||Author||Last Editor||Created||Last Edited|
|CommentStreams:28e6e3bbcbf1b597f6b467c365fac367||Use Case 0: Systems Engineering Novices||systems tools and techniques||The information is rich in content. but what i feel it should also have, as it is expected of us to research upon and cite is system tools which i think is not available here . so , i think it would be much beneficial if there is dedicated article for it.||anonymous||Mar 30 at 1:48 pm|
|CommentStreams:98d43d19d05cc4387152680f8a77a800||An Overview of ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288, System Life Cycle Processes||Where to find "An Overview of ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288, System Life Cycle Processes."||While this might be considered a primary reference for a number of articles, it doesn't appear to be available anywhere that Google can find it.
For such a relevant reference, it would be good to be Open Access and available for further reference.
|anonymous||Mar 21 at 10:20 am|
|CommentStreams:E6068eab90e0fb531a44d0dc11ea09d5||Decision Management||Cognitive Bias||A new subsection on cognitive bias is being submitted. The literature has concluded that faulty decisions have lead to numerous fatalities.||anonymous||Mar 16 at 6:17 pm|
|CommentStreams:0326b4c039a3a11ef5893d2fbafa2d79||Relevant Standards||ECSS-E-ST-10-02 standard was replaced by a new revision||This Standard has been cancelled and replaced by ECSS-E-ST-10-02C Rev.1 (1 February 2018)||anonymous||Mar 11 at 11:57 am|
|CommentStreams:79d91fd1ee9b87a3fc779e679c5d9bed||Scope of the SEBoK||Where is the Figure 1?||There is links in other parts to Figure 1 in this part but I can't find it.||anonymous||Mar 5 at 2:00 am|
|CommentStreams:33182faa49ffa16bf951b0c7dff41d3f||Software Engineering Features - Models, Methods, Tools, Standards, and Metrics||Software Development||Great information!!
This article shares valuable information about Software Development. ABIT CORP Software development company in Indore is having more than 45 highly skilled technocrats in a team won the trust of many clients across the world with many projects having a variety of concepts or innovative ideas developed in the last 9 years from the year of our company establishment in 2010. This includes Customized software or ERP development for industries, Ecommerce Portal frontend and backend development with analytical dashboard, Marketplace development, ERP of restaurant listing and food ordering delivery app, Manufacturing ERP development including Production Planning and consumption, sales CRM module, Accounting, and Finance module, HR payroll module, MRP material requirement planning module, Inventory Store Purchase module, MIS statistical Reporting with interactive dashboard, projects of CMS development, Wordpress Customization, plugin development, Android and iPhone mobile app development. Get in touch with us: [] or +91-809045666. Visit here: https://www.abitcorp.com/software-solution.php
|anonymous||Feb 26 at 9:47 am|
|CommentStreams:5265fd91463cea414c444d12ec1fb6e5||Mission Engineering||ConOps or OpsCon||Is here really ConOps ment? Does OpsCon make more sense?||anonymous||Feb 24 at 9:03 am|
|CommentStreams:79a60a095577526eee6c80fba04a804d||vee (v) model||The link is broken||The link provided for the source is broken||anonymous||Feb 19 at 11:20 am|
|CommentStreams:3a92a25bf19d553a295044bf778c1e54||Set-Based Design||Identify Sets?||Could we (INCOSE) explain in more detail what are the “Sets” of the Feasible Design phase which are somehow other than the “Alternatives” of the earlier Tradespace Evaluation phase? Making the distinction is important because of the advice: “[o]nce the tradespace contains an acceptable number of alternatives, it is then classified by sets. This is an essential part of SBD.”||anonymous||Feb 17 at 7:54 pm|
|CommentStreams:736a588e2c229cbdb02a544de941e67c||System Requirements||Verification vs Validation||At the very beginning of the article when saying "Act as reference for validation and stakeholder acceptance.", it should rather say "act as reference for verification" because validation is used rather against stakeholder requirements whereas verification is based on system requirements. The distinction is clearly stated in the glossary so it should be made also in the article.||anonymous||Feb 11 at 10:04 pm|
|CommentStreams:D52cbb16f7ed2d3c129bf0a003055968||Security Engineering||This is a step back||from the old SSE page. tsk tsk.||anonymous||Jan 22 at 4:57 pm|
|CommentStreams:A89380e9b2a79c56aa595afc5926f43e||qualification||Hydro testing services in UAE||I haven’t known about it before. This article is very helpful!
Thank you so much!
|anonymous||Jan 4 at 9:37 am|
|CommentStreams:46aa1366db8f57452d90bac34d03fffc||function||Discussion doesn't match definitions||(3) and (4) within the 'Discussion' section appear to be the wrong way round when compared to the definitions. (3) is the management definition, whilst (4) is the system component definition.||anonymous||Dec 20 at 12:31 pm|
|CommentStreams:60ee79c60bd29311b1d425b6bafcf6c0||Systems Engineering Overview||Typo||SE is performed as part of a life cycel approach.||anonymous||Dec 10 at 1:39 am|
|CommentStreams:0213e8bb0b354893ad56fb9cf25f6ed3||NASA Systems Engineering Handbook||Available||anonymous||Nov 30 at 4:48 pm|
|CommentStreams:A37316c43b698d6b2d3c6c05a1af6007||NASA Systems Engineering Handbook||Newer Version is Avavilable||https://www.nasa.gov/feature/release-of-revision-to-the-nasa-systems-engineering-handbook-sp-2016-6105-rev-2||anonymous||Nov 30 at 4:48 pm|
|CommentStreams:190853127555d88f634a640790f6f5c5||GEIA-859||Link to GEIA website broken||Link to GEIA website broken||anonymous||Nov 5 at 12:40 pm|
|CommentStreams:E8ac23b226b30e483ce839a4446d0faa||GEIA-HB-649||Broken link||The link to the GEIA website appears, to me, to be broken.||anonymous||Nov 5 at 10:28 am|
|CommentStreams:E62fc829b48be8e5647261ef2933e5be||Risk Management Guide for DoD Acquisition||2017 Version of document||The current version of this document is:
Department of Defense Risk, Issue, and Opportunity Management Guide for Defense Acquisition Programs, January 2017, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering, Washington, D.C.
Consider updating the System Engineering Body of Knowledge to reflect this version.
|anonymous||Nov 5 at 3:01 am|
|CommentStreams:1f7758a034c202d7574ac1dbb523cc54||Set-Based Design||Next Article hyperlink incorrect||The Next Article hyperlink at the bottom of this page takes you to the Systems Engineering Core Concepts page, but in the table of contents on the left of the page, the next article is called Model-Based Systems Engineering Adoption Trends 2009-2018.||anonymous||Nov 4 at 1:00 am|